| |
EVENT>Open Pairs Correction |SESSION>Friday Morn |SECTION> A N-S
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 24, 2012 |SANCTION>ST1208038 | 08/25/2012 00:06|EVENT CODE>15OP
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Dan Papineau |RATING>STAC, CLUB>113712 |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 108.0 |TOP> 8 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/750 |CLUB>Atlanta Duplicate Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=5/C=3 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Norma McNeill Raymond Handfield B 4 2 . 119.81 55.47 0.74(B)
2 Martha Fallaw Mary Daneke C . . 1 101.81 47.13 0.77(C)
3 William Kulbersh Sara Medlin A . . . 104.63 48.44
4 Judy Fendrick Karolyn Smith A 1 . . 130.50 60.42 1.83(A)
5 Richard Johnson Raymond Reusche C . . . 90.00 41.67
6 Harold Task Edward Foran A 2 . . 128.25 59.38 1.28(A)
7 Lorraine Siegel Rita Edlin A . . . 100.00 46.30
8 Judy Vanrysselberge Sue Newell C . . . 95.63 44.27
9 Carole Budnick Norma Ambery A . . . 87.00 40.28
10 Sarah Goodstein Michelle Alterman A 5 . . 109.13 50.52 0.37(A)
11 Lanette Moore Lois Keith A . . . 107.50 49.77
12 Elaine Perlman Dennis Kanne B 3 1 . 125.44 58.07 1.05(B)
Totals 1299.70
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
/
1> 1 3- 3- 7- 7- 3- 6 0 3-
200 ---- ---- 450 450 490 490 ---- 450 460 -50 450
2> 7- 2- 2- 6 2- 2- 2- 2- 7-
-110 ---- ---- -150 -150 -120 -150 ---- -150 -150 -150 -110
3> 2 3- - 6 8 3- - 5 7
-200 ---- ---- -170 -300 70 200 ---- -170 -300 -50 100
4> 5 3 7- 1- 0 1- 5 5 7-
-630 -650 ---- ---- ---- 100 -660 -1430 -660 -630 -630 100
5> 2 5- 8 0 5- 5- 2 5- 2
630 660 ---- ---- ---- 690 -200 660 660 630 660 630
6> 4 6 8 - 2 7 4 4 -
-130 -110 ---- ---- ---- 110 -600 -150 100 -130 -130 -600
7> 8 1 0 6 7 5 2 4 3
200 ---- -200 ---- ---- -500 -100 -90 -110 -150 -120 -140
8> 5 1- 5 1- 7 5 1- 8 1-
-420 ---- -450 ---- ---- -420 -450 -140 -420 -450 50 -450
9> 1 5 0 4 7- 2 7- 6 3
-110 ---- 150 ---- ---- -670 130 430 -100 430 200 100
10> 3- 3- 7 5 7 1- 0 1- 7
110 110 620 500 ---- ---- 620 -100 -300 ---- -100 620
11> 5 2 0 5 5 5 1 5 8
-50 -80 -130 -50 ---- ---- -50 -50 -100 ---- -50 110
12> 3 8 - 4- 6- 6- - 2 4-
-120 300 -530 -110 ---- ---- 50 50 -530 ---- -140 -110
13> 2- 1 6 6 6 0 2- 6 6
170 -100 620 620 620 ---- ---- -300 170 620 620 ----
14> 4- 8 4- 7 1- 1- 0 4- 4-
-100 420 -100 -50 -170 ---- ---- -170 -420 -100 -100 ----
15> 5 3- 0 3- 7 7 7 1 2
-90 -110 -400 -110 50 ---- ---- 50 50 -300 -130 ----
16> 6 2 8 2 2 2 2 6 6
-680 -1430 -650 -----1430 -1430 ---- -----1430 -1430 -680 -680
17> 5 3 7 5 1 1 1 8 5
-50 -100 50 ---- -50 -170 ---- ---- -170 -170 140 -50
18> 2- 2- 6 - 8 4 6 - 6
-130 -130 90 ---- -400 120 ---- ---- 50 90 -400 90
19> 2- 4 5- 0 7 1 5- 2- 8
---- -140 -50 100 -650 110 -300 ---- ---- 100 -140 470
20> 1- 5- 4 7- 1- 1- 5- 7- 1-
---- PASS 110 100 140 PASS PASS ---- ---- 110 140 PASS
21> 4- 1 4- 0 4- 4- 7- 2 7-
---- 170 110 170 100 170 170 ---- ---- 620 140 620
22> 7- 4- 4- 7- 0 1 2 4- 4-
450 420 420 450 -150 -50 140 420 ---- ---- 420 ----
23> 0 3 6 6 8 6 2 1 4
-200 100 620 620 650 620 -100 -130 ---- ---- 170 ----
24> 8 2 3 4- 1 6 7 4- 0
50 -120 -110 -100 -130 -90 -50 -100 ---- ---- -500 ----
25> 8 6 6 6 0 1- 3- 1- 3-
170 140 140 140 -100 ---- -50 110 -50 ---- ---- 110
26> 8 0 6 7 5 3 4 2 1
670 -1100 -130 -110 -150 ---- -620 -600 -630 ---- ---- -800
27> 2- 2- 2- 7 2- 7 2- 2- 7
-980 -980 -980 -480 -980 ---- -480 -980 -980 ---- ---- -480
28> 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 8
---- -510 ---- -510 -1010 -510 -510 -510 -510 -510 ---- -400
29> 5 7 8 1 5 1 1 5 3
---- 100 ---- 200 300 -690 100 -690 -690 100 ---- -660
30> 7 1 7 4 2 4 7 4 0
---- 140 ---- 80 140 110 100 110 140 110 ---- -100
31> 4 4 - 7 - 2 7 7 4
---- ---- 140 140 -100 300 -100 50 300 300 140 ----
32> 2 2 5 5 8 0 5 7 2
---- ---- 170 170 420 420 920 -100 420 550 170 ----
33> 2 5- 7 8 1 3- 3- 0 5-
---- ---- -150 90 120 400 -200 -50 -50 -630 90 ----
EVENT>Open Pairs Correction |SESSION>Friday Morn |SECTION> A E-W
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>August 24, 2012 |SANCTION>ST1208038 | 08/25/2012 00:06|EVENT CODE>15OP
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Dan Papineau |RATING>STAC, CLUB>113712 |MOVEMENT>MITCHELL
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE> 108.0 |TOP> 8 |MP LIMITS>None/2000/750 |CLUB>Atlanta Duplicate Bridge
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=12/B=6/C=1 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section |
No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ ---------
1 Jack Carter Ernie Eayrs B 3 2 . 124.00 57.41 0.92(A)
2 Betty McDonald Laurel Anne Barrett B . . . 91.50 42.36
3 David Zeckets Fred Moore A 1 . . 137.00 63.43 1.83(A)
4 Vinay Apte Maureen McGuire A . . . 98.00 45.37
5 W Henry Shuford Nancy Shuford B . . . 92.00 42.59
6 Connie Smilowitz Stu Goff A 5 . . 118.50 54.86 0.37(A)
7 Jane Bachman Jim Stogner A 4 . . 120.50 55.79 0.64(A)
8 M Jane Shea Kay Paris A . . . 110.50 51.16
9 David Schulman Steve Callaham B 2 1 . 125.50 58.10 1.28(A)
10 Minerva Phillips Anne Barnwell B . . . 84.00 38.89
11 Diane Strickland Terry Cherniak C . . . 86.50 40.05
Totals 1188.00
**PAIRS**
BOARD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
/
1> 7 - 4- 4- 4- 2 4- 8 -
-200 -490 ---- -450 ---- -450 -450 -460 -450 50 -490
2> - 5- - 5- 5- 5- 5- 5- 2
110 150 ---- 110 ---- 150 150 150 150 150 120
3> 6 0 1 4- 4- 7- 7- 3 2
200 -200 ---- -100 ---- 170 170 300 300 50 -70
4> 6- 5 8 6- 3 - 3 - 3
660 650 1430 ---- 660 ---- 630 -100 630 -100 630
5> 8 2- 2- 2- 6 6 2- 0 6
200 -660 -660 ---- -660 ---- -630 -630 -660 -690 -630
6> 7- 2 6 1 4 7- 4 0 4
600 110 150 ---- -100 ---- 130 600 130 -110 130
7> 5 1 7 3 6 4 8 0 2
140 90 200 110 ---- 150 ---- 120 500 -200 100
8> 6- 1 6- 3 6- 0 3 3 6-
450 140 450 420 ---- 450 ---- -50 420 420 450
9> 5 - 3 6 - 2 8 7 4
-100 -430 -150 100 ---- -430 ---- -200 670 110 -130
10> 6- 1 8 3 1 6- 4- 1 4-
100 -620 300 -500 -620 ---- 100 ---- -110 -620 -110
11> 3 8 7 3 0 3 3 3 6
50 130 100 50 -110 ---- 50 ---- 50 50 80
12> 1- 7- 7- 3- 3- 6 5 1- 0
-50 530 530 110 110 ---- 140 ---- 120 -50 -300
13> 2 5- 2 2 2 2 5- 7 8
-620 -170 -620 -620 -620 -620 ---- -170 ---- 100 300
14> 3- 8 1 3- 6- 3- 3- 0 6-
100 420 50 100 170 100 ---- 100 ---- -420 170
15> 8 1 4- 7 1 6 3 4- 1
400 -50 110 300 -50 130 ---- 90 ---- 110 -50
16> 6 2 6 6 2 6 2 6 0
1430 680 1430 1430 680 1430 680 ---- 1430 ---- 650
17> 7 3 7 3 0 7 3 5 1
170 50 170 50 -140 170 50 ---- 100 ---- -50
18> 4 2 2 7- 7- 0 5- 5- 2
-50 -90 -90 400 400 -120 130 ---- 130 ---- -90
19> 2- 2- 8 5- 1 0 7 5- 4
-100 -100 650 140 -110 -470 300 140 ---- 50 ----
20> 4 2- - - 6- 6- 6- 6- 2-
-100 -110 -140 -140 PASS PASS PASS PASS ---- -110 ----
21> 3- - 8 6 3- - 3- 3- 7
-170 -620 -100 -140 -170 -620 -170 -170 ---- -110 ----
22> 8 3- 7 - 6 3- 3- 3- -
---- 150 -420 50 -450 -140 -420 -420 -420 ---- -450
23> 0 4 2 8 6 5 7 2 2
---- -650 -170 -620 200 100 -100 130 -620 ---- -620
24> 7 8 2 0 1 6 3- 5 3-
---- 130 500 90 -50 50 120 100 110 ---- 100
25> 8 4- 0 6- 2 4- 2 6- 2
100 ---- -110 -170 50 -140 -110 -140 50 -140 ----
26> 3 7 0 5 8 4 2 6 1
150 ---- 800 -670 620 1100 600 130 630 110 ----
27> 5- 1 5- 1 5- 5- 5- 5- 1
980 ---- 480 980 480 980 980 980 980 480 ----
28> 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 8
---- 510 ---- 510 510 510 400 510 510 510 1010
29> 7 3 3 7 5 7 1 3 0
---- 690 ---- -100 -100 690 660 690 -200 -100 -300
30> 4 6 1 4 8 1 7 4 1
---- -110 ---- -100 -140 -110 100 -140 -80 -110 -140
31> 1 7- 6 4 1 4 1 7- 4
-300 ---- 100 ---- -50 -140 -300 -140 -300 100 -140
32> 3 0 8 6 3 6 1 3 6
-420 ---- -920 ---- 100 -170 -420 -170 -550 -420 -170
33> 0 7 4- 6 4- 2- 8 1 2-
-400 ---- 200 ---- 50 150 50 -90 630 -120 -90
Open Pairs Correction, Friday Morn, August 24, 2012
Board 1 North Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 6-Task-Foran vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 NT | N | 6 | 490 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 NT | N | 5 | 460 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 8-Shea-Paris |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
4 ♥ | S | 5 | 450 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 ♥ | S | 5 | 200 | | 1.00 | 7.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
6 ♥ | S | −1 | | 50 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
1 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 7.50 | 0.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
1 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 7.50 | 0.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
1 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 8-Shea-Paris |
1 NT | E | 3 | | 150 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
Board 3 South Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 ♥ | S | 5 | 200 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
5 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
1 ♦ | N | 1 | 70 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♠ | E | 4 | | 170 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
2 ♠ | E | 5 | | 200 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
5 ♥× | S | −2 | | 300 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
5 ♥× | S | −2 | | 300 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 8-Shea-Paris |
Board 4 West Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
5 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 6-Task-Foran vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 ♥ | E | −1 | 100 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 NT | E | 4 | | 630 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 650 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 NT | W | 5 | | 660 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 1430 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 5 North Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | N | 6 | 690 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
3 NT | S | 5 | 660 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 NT | S | 4 | 630 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 8-Shea-Paris |
6 NT | N | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♦ | W | −1 | 100 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
2 ♦ | W | 3 | | 110 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
2 ♦ | W | 5 | | 150 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 NT | E | 3 | | 600 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 8-Shea-Paris |
Board 7 South Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♠ | E | −2 | 200 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
1 NT | W | 1 | | 90 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
1 NT | W | 2 | | 120 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
2 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
1 NT | W | 3 | | 150 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
2 ♦ | S | −2 | | 200 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
2 ♦× | N | −2 | | 500 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
Board 8 West Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♥ | E | 3 | | 140 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♥ | E | 4 | | 420 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 450 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
4 ♥ | E | 5 | | 450 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
Board 9 North Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | N | 4 | 430 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 NT | N | 4 | 430 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♠× | W | −1 | 200 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
2 NT | N | 3 | 150 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
2 ♣ | S | 4 | 130 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
2 ♠ | E | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 5.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
5 ♣× | S | −1 | | 100 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | W | 2 | | 110 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
2 ♠× | E | 2 | | 670 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
Board 10 East Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♠× | E | −2 | 500 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
2 ♦ | S | 3 | 110 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 NT | N | −3 | | 300 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 11 South Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♥ | N | 2 | 110 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
2 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
1 ♠ | E | 1 | | 80 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
2 ♥ | N | −2 | | 100 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
2 ♦ | W | 4 | | 130 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
Board 12 West Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT× | E | −2 | 300 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 ♠ | W | −1 | 50 | | 6.50 | 1.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 6.50 | 1.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
2 ♠ | E | 2 | | 110 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | W | 2 | | 110 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
1 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
3 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♠× | W | 3 | | 530 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 ♠× | W | 3 | | 530 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 13 North Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 5.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♥ | S | 4 | 170 | | 2.50 | 5.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♥ | S | −1 | | 100 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♦ | N | −3 | | 300 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
Board 14 East Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 ♥ | N | −1 | | 50 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
4 ♥× | S | −1 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 8-Shea-Paris |
5 ♦× | S | −1 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
5 ♦× | S | −1 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
4 ♥ | S | −2 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
3 ♠ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♠ | W | 4 | | 420 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
Board 15 South Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 ♣ | W | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
1 NT | W | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
1 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
2 ♣ | W | 2 | | 90 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♣ | W | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♣ | W | 3 | | 110 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | | 130 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♥ | N | −3 | | 300 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 400 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
Board 16 West Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | W | 5 | | 650 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♥ | W | 6 | | 680 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♥ | W | 6 | | 680 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♥ | W | 6 | | 680 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
6 ♥ | W | 6 | | 1430 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
6 ♥ | W | 6 | | 1430 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 1430 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
6 ♥ | W | 6 | | 1430 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
6 ♥ | W | 6 | | 1430 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 17 North Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♣ | E | −1 | 50 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♦ | S | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♦ | S | −2 | | 100 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
3 ♥ | E | 4 | | 170 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 ♥ | W | 4 | | 170 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 18 East Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
1 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 ♦ | W | −1 | 50 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
2 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
2 ♠ | N | −4 | | 400 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | N | −4 | | 400 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
Board 19 South Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 ♦× | N | 3 | 470 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♦ | N | 3 | 110 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 ♠ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | | 50 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♠ | W | 3 | | 140 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
5 ♦× | N | −2 | | 300 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♠ | W | 5 | | 650 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 20 West Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
1 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 6.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 8-Shea-Paris |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 6.50 | 6-Task-Foran vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 6.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
Pass | | | Pass | | 1.50 | 6.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
Board 21 North Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 8-Shea-Paris |
2 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
2 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 6-Task-Foran vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
2 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 1.00 | 7.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♣ | E | −2 | 100 | | 0.00 | 8.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 22 East Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 450 | | 7.50 | 0.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♥ | N | 4 | 420 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 8-Shea-Paris |
4 ♥ | S | 4 | 420 | | 4.50 | 3.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♣ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 NT | N | −3 | | 150 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
Board 23 South Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | N | 5 | 650 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♠ | S | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♠ | N | 4 | 620 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 ♠ | S | 4 | 170 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
5 ♦ | E | −1 | 100 | | 3.00 | 5.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
5 ♥ | S | −1 | | 100 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
4 ♦ | E | 4 | | 130 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 8-Shea-Paris |
4 ♠ | S | −2 | | 200 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
Board 24 West Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 NT | E | −1 | 50 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
1 NT | N | −1 | | 50 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
1 NT | E | 1 | | 90 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
1 NT | N | −2 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
1 NT | N | −2 | | 100 | 4.50 | 3.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♣ | E | 3 | | 110 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
1 NT | E | 2 | | 120 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♣ | E | 4 | | 130 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
2 NT× | N | −3 | | 500 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 25 North Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 ♠ | N | 4 | 170 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 8-Shea-Paris |
2 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 6.00 | 2.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 3.50 | 4.50 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
4 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
3 ♠ | N | −1 | | 50 | 1.50 | 6.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♠ | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
Board 26 East Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♥× | S | 2 | 670 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
3 ♣ | W | 3 | | 110 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♣ | W | 4 | | 130 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 8-Shea-Paris |
4 ♣ | E | 5 | | 150 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 600 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
5 ♣ | W | 6 | | 620 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
3 NT | W | 4 | | 630 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
2 ♠× | N | −3 | | 800 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 ♠× | N | −4 | | 1100 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
Board 27 South Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
4 ♥ | E | 6 | | 480 | 7.00 | 1.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 1-McNeill-Handfield vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 8-Shea-Paris |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
6 ♥ | E | 6 | | 980 | 2.50 | 5.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
Board 28 West Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | W | 3 | | 400 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
5 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♥ | E | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
5 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
4 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 8-Shea-Paris |
4 ♥ | W | 7 | | 510 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
6 ♥ | W | 7 | | 1010 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
Board 29 North Deals Both Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
6 NT | E | −3 | 300 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
6 NT | E | −2 | 200 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
6 NT | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
6 ♥ | W | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
6 NT | E | −1 | 100 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
4 NT | E | 5 | | 660 | 3.00 | 5.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 NT | E | 6 | | 690 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
4 NT | E | 6 | | 690 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 NT | E | 6 | | 690 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 8-Shea-Paris |
Board 30 East Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
2 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 2-Fallaw-Daneke vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
1 ♠ | S | 3 | 140 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 ♠ | N | 3 | 140 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 8-Shea-Paris |
1 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 2-McDonald-Barrett |
2 ♠ | N | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
1 ♠ | S | 2 | 110 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
1 NT | E | −2 | 100 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 4-Apte-McGuire |
1 ♠ | S | 1 | 80 | | 1.00 | 7.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
4 ♠ | S | −2 | | 100 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 12-Perlman-Kanne vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
Board 31 South Deals N-S Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 ♦× | E | −2 | 300 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
3 ♦× | E | −2 | 300 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 ♦× | E | −2 | 300 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
3 ♥ | S | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♥ | N | 3 | 140 | | 4.00 | 4.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
4 ♦ | E | −1 | 50 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
3 NT | S | −1 | | 100 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
3 ♥ | N | −1 | | 100 | 0.50 | 7.50 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
Board 32 West Deals E-W Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
6 ♣ | N | 6 | 920 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
5 ♣× | S | 5 | 550 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
5 ♣ | N | 6 | 420 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
5 ♦ | N | 6 | 420 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
5 ♦ | S | 6 | 420 | | 5.00 | 3.00 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
4 ♦ | S | 6 | 170 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
4 ♦ | S | 6 | 170 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
3 ♦ | S | 6 | 170 | | 2.00 | 6.00 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
5 ♣ | N | −2 | | 100 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
Board 33 North Deals None Vul
Contract | By | Made | Scores | Matchpoints | Pairs |
| | | N-S | E-W | N-S | E-W | |
3 NT | N | 3 | 400 | | 8.00 | 0.00 | 6-Task-Foran vs 1-Carter-Eayrs |
2 NT | N | 2 | 120 | | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5-Johnson-Reusche vs 10-Phillips-Barnwell |
1 NT | S | 1 | 90 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 4-Fendrick-Smith vs 8-Shea-Paris |
1 NT | N | 1 | 90 | | 5.50 | 2.50 | 11-Moore-Keith vs 11-Strickland-Cherniak |
3 ♦ | N | −1 | | 50 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 8-Vanrysselberge-Newell vs 5-Shuford-Shuford |
2 NT | N | −1 | | 50 | 3.50 | 4.50 | 9-Budnick-Ambery vs 7-Bachman-Stogner |
3 NT | S | −3 | | 150 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 3-Kulbersh-Medlin vs 6-Smilowitz-Goff |
2 ♠ | W | 5 | | 200 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 7-Siegel-Edlin vs 3-Zeckets-Moore |
3 ♠× | W | 4 | | 630 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 10-Goodstein-Alterman vs 9-Schulman-Callaham |
|